4.7 Article

Chemical composition and morphology of the Mediterranean mussel, Black Sea coast of Russia

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113692

Keywords

Mediterranean mussels; Anthropogenic pollution; Biogeochemistry; Morphometric characteristics

Funding

  1. Kuban Science Foundation of the RFBR [MFI-20.1/6]
  2. Krasnodar Krai [19-45-230020 r a]
  3. State Task FRC SSC RAS [0492-2021-0016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the pollution level of a coastal marine zone caused by the Olympic construction by analyzing the chemical composition of mussels' soft tissues. The findings show anthropogenic pollution in the coastal zone, most significant in the 50-meter zone along the coast. However, the ecological situation stabilizes by 2019. This research is crucial for comprehensive ecological monitoring in similar coastal-marine zones.
Mussels, whose soft tissues are used in food and are rich in high-quality protein, are essential in marine fisheries. Mediterranean mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis Lam) used to assesses the pollution level of a coastal marine zone due to exposure to local technological processes populate the metal piles of a pier built for the 2014 Olympics in Sochi Olympic Park. The chemical composition of mussel soft tissues (61 elements analyzed by the ICP method) indicates anthropogenic pollution of the coastal zone ecosystem, most pronounced in the 50-m zone along the coast due to run off from the terrestrial ecosystem affected by the Olympic construction. Line measurements of annual rings of 6-year-old individuals of mussels showed stabilization of the ecological situation in the coastalmarine zone by 2019. This study can be used for comprehensive ecological monitoring of coastal-marine zones with similar conditions and anthropogenic load.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available