4.7 Article

Physical and chemical degradation of littered personal protective equipment (PPE) under simulated environmental conditions

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 178, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113587

Keywords

Mask; Glove; PPE; Degradation; Polymer; Plastic

Funding

  1. Akademie fur menschliche Medizin GmbH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the physicochemical degradation of personal protective equipment (PPE) in the marine environment and found that PPE undergoes changes in polymer backbone, crystallinity, and physical integrity due to sun exposure. The presence of harmful elements and signs of physical degradation were also detected. These findings contribute to a better understanding of PPE degradation in the marine environment and the subsequent release of microplastics and chemical contaminants.
Investigations of the physicochemical degradation of personal protective equipment (PPE) under controlled environmental conditions are largely lacking. Here the chemical and physical changes of face masks and gloves (recovered from the marine environment) were evaluated after exposure time up to 60 days of simulated environmental conditions. The results suggested that the polymer backbone of PPE suffers typical changes induced by sun exposure. Changes in the intensity of diffraction peaks indicated shifts in the crystallinity of PPE, possibly altering their thermal behavior. Signs of physical degradation in PPE, such as ruptures, and rough surfaces, which exacerbated over time were also detected. Additionally, signals of some elements of concern, such as Cu and Mo, and elements typically found in seawater were detected. The results of this study allowed us to better understand the degradation of typical PPE items in the marine environment, ultimately resulting in the release of microplastics and chemical contaminants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available