4.4 Article

Factors influencing health workers' compliance with outpatient malaria 'test and treat' guidelines during the plateauing performance phase in Kenya, 2014-2016

Journal

MALARIA JOURNAL
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12936-022-04093-x

Keywords

Malaria; Case-management; Factors; 'Test and Treat'; Compliance; Kenya

Funding

  1. Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria
  2. U.S. President's Malaria Initiative/USAID
  3. DELTAS Africa Initiative [DEL-15-003]
  4. New Partnership for Africa's Development Planning and Coordinating Agency (NEPAD Agency)
  5. Wellcome Trust [107769/Z/10/Z, s 103602, 212176, 203077]
  6. UK government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the factors associated with compliance levels of outpatient malaria 'test and treat' guidelines in Kenyan health facilities. The results showed that geographical factors, institutional ownership, health workers' perception of malaria, supervision with feedback, access to guidelines, and patient symptoms were all factors that influenced compliance. To optimize outpatient malaria case-management, it is important to improve compliance in low-risk areas, ensure the availability of testing and treatment commodities, strengthen health workers' knowledge through training, and provide ongoing supervision and feedback.
Background Health workers' compliance with outpatient malaria 'test and treat' guidelines has improved since 2010 but plateaued from 2014 at suboptimal levels in Kenya. This study examined the factors associated with high but suboptimal compliance levels at facilities with available malaria tests and drugs. Methods Data from four national, cross-sectional health facility surveys undertaken between 2014 and 2016 in Kenya were analysed. Association between 31 factors and compliance with malaria testing (survey range (SR): 65-69%) and no anti-malarial treatment for test negative patients (SR: 90-92%) were examined using multilevel logistic regression models. Results A total of 2,752 febrile patients seen by 594 health workers at 486 health facilities were analysed. Higher odds of malaria testing were associated with lake endemic (aOR = 12.12; 95% CI: 5.3-27.6), highland epidemic (aOR = 5.06; 95% CI: 2.7-9.5) and semi-arid seasonal (aOR = 2.07; 95% CI: 1.2-3.6) compared to low risk areas; faith-based (FBO)/ non-governmental organization (NGO)-owned compared to government-owned facilities (aOR = 5.80; 95% CI: 3.2-10.6); health workers' perception of malaria endemicity as high-risk (aOR = 3.05; 95% CI: 1.8-5.2); supervision with feedback (aOR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.2-2.9); access to guidelines (aOR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.1-3.4); older patients compared to infants, higher temperature measurements and main complaints of fever, diarrhoea, headache, vomiting and chills. Lower odds of testing were associated with febrile patients having main complaints of a cough (aOR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.5-0.9), a rash (aOR = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.2-0.7) or a running nose (aOR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.4-0.9). Other factors associated with compliance with test negative results included the type of diagnostic test available at the facility, in-service training, health workers' age, and correct knowledge of the targeted treatment policy. Conclusions To optimize outpatient malaria case-management, reduce testing compliance gaps and eliminate overtreatment of test negative patients, there is a need to focus on compliance within low malaria risk areas in addition to ensuring the universal and continuous availability of 'test and treat' commodities. Targeting of older and government health workers; dissemination of updated guidelines; and continuing with in-service training and supportive supervision with feedback is essential. Lastly, there is a need to improve health workers' knowledge about malaria testing criteria considering their perceptions of endemicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available