4.7 Review

2D Covalent Organic Frameworks as Photocatalysts for Solar Energy Utilization

Journal

MACROMOLECULAR RAPID COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 43, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/marc.202200108

Keywords

covalent organic frameworks; photocatalysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21905150, 31202117]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2020ZD38]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the context of the energy crisis and global warming, developing clean and sustainable energy through photocatalytic processes is gaining attention. Organic porous polymers, particularly covalent organic frameworks (COFs), have emerged as promising photocatalysts due to their high crystallinity, porosity, and structural designability.
In the context of the energy crisis and global warming, developing clean and sustainable energy is receiving increasing attention. Photocatalytic processes including water splitting, CO2 reduction, coenzyme regeneration, etc., provide ideal ways to utilize renewable solar resources. The photocatalyst plays a central role in photocatalytic processes. Organic porous polymers have recently gained extensive attention in photocatalysis. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs), as one of the organic porous polymers, have the characteristics of high crystallinity, porosity, and structural designability that make them perfect platforms for photocatalysis. In this minireview, the recent progress of 2D COFs as photocatalysts is summarized including the recent work. The synthesis of the diversified structures of the COFs including the different linkages is first introduced. Then, the photocatalytic applications of the 2D COFs including photocatalytic hydrogen evolution, CO2 conversion, coenzyme regeneration, and other traditional organic reaction are then discussed. Finally, conclusions and prospects are provided in the last section.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available