4.7 Article

The Ocean's labile DOC supply chain

Journal

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages 1007-1021

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lno.12053

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Simons Foundation [542391]
  2. NSF [OCE-2019589, OCE-1948104, GRFP-1445117, GRFP-1842396]
  3. Swedish Research Council [2018-06571]
  4. JSPS
  5. Swedish Research Council [2018-06571] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbes in the surface ocean play a crucial role in releasing, consuming, and exchanging labile metabolites at short time scales. However, the details of this process in the global carbon cycle are not well understood due to methodological challenges. A new compilation of published data suggests that approximately half of the ocean's net primary production is processed through the labile dissolved organic carbon (DOC) pool, with contributions from living phytoplankton, dead and dying phytoplankton, and heterotrophic microbes and mesoplankton.
Microbes of the surface ocean release, consume, and exchange labile metabolites at time scales of minutes to days. The details of this important step in the global carbon cycle remain poorly resolved, largely due to the methodological challenges of studying a diverse pool of metabolites that are produced and consumed nearly simultaneously. In this perspective, a new compilation of published data builds on previous studies to obtain an updated estimate of the fraction of marine net primary production that passes through the labile dissolved organic carbon (DOC) pool. In agreement with previous studies, our data mining and modeling approaches hypothesize that about half of ocean net primary production is processed through the labile DOC pool. The fractional contributions from three major sources are estimated at 0.4 for living phytoplankton, 0.4 for dead and dying phytoplankton, and 0.2 for heterotrophic microbes and mesoplankton.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available