4.7 Review

Role of histone demethylases and histone methyltransferases in triple-negative breast cancer: Epigenetic mnemonics

Journal

LIFE SCIENCES
Volume 292, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2022.120321

Keywords

Triple-negative breast cancer; Histone demethylases inhibitors; Histone methyltransferase inhibitors; Epi-drugs; Epigenetics

Funding

  1. DoP, Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers, Govt. of India, New Delhi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly lethal subtype of breast cancer with limited treatment options due to its complexity, drug resistance, and lack of therapeutic targets. Recent studies have shown the importance of epigenetic regulation in TNBC development, with a focus on histone methyltransferases and histone demethylases as potential targets for new targeted therapies in TNBC treatment.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a particularly lethal subtype of breast cancer owing to its heterogeneity, high drug resistance, poor prognosis and lack of therapeutic targets. Recent insights into the complexity of TNBC have been explained by epigenetic regulation and its ability to modulate certain oncogenes and tumour sup-pressor genes. This has opened an emerging area in anti-cancer therapy using epigenetic modulating drugs, highlighting the epigenetic reprogramming during tumorigenesis and tumour development. Histone methylation and demethylation are such dynamic epigenetic mechanisms mediated by histone methyltransferases (HMTs) and histone demethylases (HDMs), respectively. The interplay between HMTs and HDMs in histone methylation extrapolates their viability as druggable epigenetic targets in TNBC. In this review, we aim to summarize recent progress in the field of epigenetics focusing on HMTs and HDMs in TNBC development and their potential use in targeted therapy for TNBC management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available