4.3 Article

Phenotypic and genotypic approach to characterize a Trueperella pecoris strain isolated from necrotic vestibulitis of a camel (Camelus dromedarius)

Journal

LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 75, Issue 2, Pages 363-367

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/lam.13735

Keywords

16S rRNA gene; 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer region; camel; gap; rpoB; T; pecoris; tuf

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study characterized and identified a Trueperella pecoris strain isolated from necrotic vestibulitis in a 10-year-old camel. The strain was confirmed to be T. pecoris through phenotypic properties and phylogenetic analyses. This is the first reported isolation of T. pecoris from a camel.
The present study was designed to characterize phenotypically and genotypically a Trueperella (T.) pecoris strain isolated from necrotic vestibulitis of a 10-year-old camel (Camelus dromedarius). The species identity of T. pecoris 203/7 investigated in the present study could be confirmed by phenotypic properties and by phylogenetic analyses based on partial sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene, the 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer region, the glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase encoding gene gap, elongation factor Tu encoding gene tuf and the target gene rpoB encoding the beta-subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase. T. pecoris strain 203/7 was grouped within the genus Trueperella in the family Arcanobacteriaceae. The 16S rRNA gene analysis showed a sequence identity of 99 center dot 9% to reference strain T. pecoris DSM 111392(T). The present isolate was clearly identified as T. pecoris, the most recently described species of the genus Trueperella. Strain T. pecoris 203/7 was isolated in moderate numbers from necrotic vestibulitis of the camel and could be of some importance for the infectious process. However, the investigated strain represents the first isolation of T. pecoris from a camel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available