4.7 Article

Day versus night use of forest by red and roe deer as determined by Corine Land Cover and Copernicus Tree Cover Density: assessing use of geographic layers in movement ecology

Journal

LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages 1453-1468

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-022-01416-w

Keywords

Habitat analysis; Habitat use; Home range; Ungulates; GPS-telemetry; Movement ecology; Geographic layers; Remote sensing

Funding

  1. Fondazione Edmund Mach-FIRST PhD School, Special Research Fund (BOF) of Ghent University [01sf2313]
  2. Fund for Scientific Research Flanders Belgium [G.0189.12N]
  3. Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO) [V417616N]
  4. Sarah and Daniel Hrdy Fellowship 2015-2016 at Harvard University/OEB
  5. Autonomous Province of Trento [3479]
  6. Move-It ANR grant [ANR-16-CE02-0010-02]
  7. federal state of Baden-Wuerttemberg
  8. Federal Office for the Environment
  9. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-16-CE02-0010] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The choice of geographic layers has an effect on the assessment of diel forest use by large herbivores. Inconsistent classification of forest or open habitat was found in approximately 20% of GPS locations within smaller habitat units. Both red and roe deer used forests more during the day than at night, and this pattern was more evident with Tree Cover Density layer.
Context Diel use of forest and open habitats by large herbivores is linked to species-specific needs of multiple and heterogeneous resources. However, forest cover layers might deviate considerably for a given landscape, potentially affecting evaluations of animals' habitat use. Objectives We assessed inconsistency in the estimates of diel forest use by red and roe deer at GPS location and home range (HR) levels, using two geographic layers: Tree Cover Density (TCD) and Corine Land Cover (CLC). Methods We first measured the classification mismatch of red and roe deer GPS locations between TCD and CLC, also with respect to habitat units' size. Then, we used Generalised Least Squares models to assess the proportional use of forest at day and night at the GPS location and HR levels, both with TCD and CLC. Results About 20% of the GPS locations were inconsistently classified as forest or open habitat by the two layers, particularly within smaller habitat units. Overall proportion of forest and open habitat, though, was very similar for both layers. In all populations, both deer species used forest more at day than at night and this pattern was more evident with TCD than with CLC. However, at the HR level, forest use estimates were only marginally different between the two layers. Conclusions When estimating animal habitat use, geographic layer choice requires careful evaluation with respect to ecological questions and target species. Habitat use analyses based on GPS locations are more sensitive to layer choice than those based on home ranges.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available