Are we underestimating the annual risk of infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis in high-burden settings?

The annual risk of infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis determines a population's exposure level and thus the fraction of incident tuberculosis resulting from recent infection (often considered as having occurred within the past 2 years). Contemporary annual risk of infection estimates centre around 1% in most high-burden countries. We present three arguments why these estimates-primarily derived from cross-sectional tuberculin surveys in young school children (aged 5-12 years)-might underrepresent the true annual risk of infection. First, young children are expected to have lower risk of infection than older adolescents and adults (ie, those aged 15 years and older). Second, exposure might not lead to a positive test result in some individuals. Third, cross-sectional surveys might overlook transient immune responses. Accounting for these biases, the true annual risk of infection among adults in high-burden settings is probably closer to 5-10%. Consequently, most tuberculosis in those settings should reflect infection within the past 2 years rather than remote infection occurring many years ago. Under this reframing, major reductions in tuberculosis incidence could be achievable by focusing on the minority of people who have been recently infected.

Automated summary

The annual risk of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and the resulting incidence of tuberculosis are often underestimated, as current estimates primarily focus on young children and might not account for all cases of infection in adults. Therefore, targeting recently infected individuals could lead to significant reductions in tuberculosis incidence.