4.7 Article

XAI for myo-controlled prosthesis: Explaining EMG data for hand gesture classification

Journal

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
Volume 240, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.108053

Keywords

EMG signal decoding; eXplainable AI; Myo-controlled prosthesis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study applies explainable artificial intelligence algorithms to EMG hand gesture classification in order to understand the results of machine learning models in relation to physiological processes. The findings show that AI models recognize hand gestures by mapping and fusing high amplitude activity of synergic muscles, and that classification performance can be improved by reducing the number of electrodes and selecting key features.
Machine Learning has recently found a fertile ground in EMG signal decoding for prosthesis control. However, its understanding and acceptance are strongly limited by the notion of AI models as blackboxes. In critical fields, such as medicine and neuroscience, understanding the neurophysiological phenomena underlying models' outcomes is as relevant as the classification performances. In this work, we adapt state-of-the-art XAI algorithms to EMG hand gesture classification to understand the outcome of machine learning models with respect to physiological processes, evaluating the contribution of each input feature to the prediction and showing that AI models recognize the hand gestures by mapping and fusing efficiently high amplitude activity of synergic muscles.This allows us to (i) drastically reduce the number of required electrodes without a significant loss in classification performances, ensuring the suitability of the system for a larger population of amputees and simplifying the realization of near real-time applications and (ii) perform an efficient selection of features based on their classification relevance, apprehended by the XAI algorithms. This feature selection leads to classification improvements in term of robustness and computational time, outperforming correlation based methods. Finally, (iii) comparing the physiological explanations produced by the XAI algorithms with the experimental setting highlights inconsistencies in the electrodes positioning over different rounds or users, then improving the overall quality of the process.(c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available