4.7 Article

Extraction of aerodynamic damping and prediction of vortex-induced vibration of bridge deck using CFD simulation of forced vibration

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2022.104982

Keywords

CFD; Bridge deck; Vortex-induced vibration; Aerodynamic damping; Forced vibration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a computational fluid dynamics simulation of forced vibration of a bridge deck and proposes a novel forced vibration technique with improved efficiency, extracting amplitude-dependent aerodynamic damping.
This study presents computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation of forced vibration of a bridge deck for extraction of amplitude-dependent aerodynamic damping in the vicinity of vortex lock-in region. The coordinate system fixed on the oscillating body is used to bypass the requirement of mesh updating. The three-dimensional flow around the vibrating deck is assumed to be homogeneous in spanwise direction and simulated using the efficient high-order spectral element/Fourier method. The aerodynamic damping is extracted from the simulated lift and then used to estimate the steady-state vortex-induced vibration (VIV) amplitude for given wind velocity and structural parameters. A good match of VIV amplitudes between simulations and wind tunnel tests validates the accuracy of simulation. The VIV mechanisms are discussed from the vortex shedding modes, distributions of dynamic pressure and energy transfer from flow to bridge deck. The leading-edge vortex shedding rather than Karman vortex shedding is identified to be responsible for the VIV. The hysteresis of VIV is observed which is related to the mode change of impinging leading-edge vortex and leading-edge vortex shedding. Finally, a novel forced vibration technique with a varying amplitude is proposed that permits extraction of aerodynamic damping by a single CFD run with improved efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available