4.2 Article

Fortescue Inlet: Offshore Deposition Basins for Navigation Channel Management in Small Craft Inlets

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000689

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Maritime Resources, New Jersey Department of Transportation [17-32666]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This comprehensive case study of the coastal processes for Fortescue Inlet in New Jersey compares the effectiveness of traditional sedimentation control structures and modified dredging templates. The results suggest that the use of offshore deposition basins delivers the most promising improvement with a potential cost savings of over 10% compared to existing strategies.
A comprehensive case study of the coastal processes for Fortescue Inlet (New Jersey, USA) is presented with the objective of minimizing maintenance dredging of the navigational channel. This study compares the effectiveness of both traditional sedimentation control structures and modified dredging templates, including construction of a new jetty, modification of the length and orientation of an existing jetty, and the use of upland and offshore deposition basins. The alternatives were analyzed using Deflt3D Flexible Mesh. The results indicate that sediment transport near Fortescue Inlet is dominated by wave action with pronounced seasonal variations in wave direction. The site exhibits relatively shallow depths above the depth of closure and pronounced offshore bars. Consequently, much of the sediment transport occurs well offshore (approximately 300 m offshore) and beyond the existing jetty. The results indicate that structural modifications (i.e., relocation or lengthening) of the existing jetty do not improve the sedimentation rate within the channel. Instead, use of offshore deposition basins delivers the most promising improvement, with potential cost savings over 10% over existing strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available