Accounting for Uncertainty in Regional Flow-Ecology Relationships

Flow-ecology relationships are critical for developing and adaptively managing environmental flows. However, uncertainty often arises from data limitations and an incomplete understanding of the spatial and temporal attributes inherent to each relationship. Accounting for sources of uncertainty is critical given the mounting interest in implementing environmental flows at large scales, often with limited information. We used the South Fork Eel River watershed in northern California as a case study to demonstrate how data gaps and uncertainty in flow-ecology relationships may be better quantified. A rigorous literature review revealed that few flow-ecology relationships related directly to the flow regime, and none spanned the full range of hydrologic or geomorphic variability exhibited across the watershed. Identified data gaps informed several sensitivity analyses within a Bayesian network model which showed that the modeled ecological outcome differed by as much as 50% depending on the type and magnitude of uncertainty. This study presents a general regional framework for quantifying spatial and temporal data gaps that can be applied to other watersheds and information types to improve representation of uncertainty in flow-ecology relationships and to inform environmental flow design.

Automated summary

Flow-ecology relationships are crucial for environmental flow management, but data limitations and incomplete understanding of spatial and temporal attributes lead to uncertainty. This study uses the South Fork Eel River watershed as a case study to demonstrate how data gaps and uncertainty in flow-ecology relationships can be better quantified.