4.1 Article

Monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater: what normalisation for improved understanding of epidemic trends?

Journal

JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 712-726

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wh.2022.012

Keywords

COVID-19; normalisation; SARS-CoV-2; wastewater-based epidemiology; wastewater monitoring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the performance of different indicators for accurately interpreting SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater. The results showed that a composite index consistently performed better than other indicators, with the lowest variation in correlation coefficient across sampling points.
SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantification in wastewater has emerged as a relevant additional means to monitor the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the concentration can be affected by black water dilution factors or movements of the sewer shed population, leading to misinterpretation of measurement results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of different indicators to accurately interpret SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater. Weekly/bi-weekly measurements from three cities in France were analysed from February to September 2021. The concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 gene copies were normalised to the faecal-contributing population using simple sewage component indicators. To reduce the measurement error, a composite index was created to combine simultaneously the information carried by the simple indicators. The results showed that the regularity (mean absolute difference between observation and the smoothed curve) of the simple indicators substantially varied across sampling points. The composite index consistently showed better regularity compared to the other indicators and was associated to the lowest variation in correlation coefficient across sampling points. These findings suggest the recommendation for the use of a composite index in wastewater-based epidemiology to compensate for variability in measurement results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available