4.6 Article

Structure-Based Design and Antigenic Validation of Respiratory Syncytial Virus G Immunogens

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.02201-21

Keywords

monoclonal antibodies; respiratory syncytial virus; structure-activity relationships; vaccines

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID, NIH [NR-21973]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) [R56AI141537]
  3. NIAID [5R44AI122360]
  4. Cota Robles Fellowship
  5. NIH S10 shared instrumentation grant [1S10OD027012-01]
  6. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P30 GM124169]
  7. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  8. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  9. NIH [S10OD021832]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of severe lower respiratory tract disease in children, the elderly, and immunocompromised individuals. Currently, there are no FDA-approved RSV vaccines. Previous studies have identified engineered RSV G proteins with increased immunogenicity and safety. In this study, we confirmed that one mutant RSV G protein retains high-affinity binding to protective antibodies and has the same three-dimensional structure as the wild-type RSV G protein. These findings support the further development of this engineered RSV G protein as a vaccine antigen.
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of severe lower respiratory tract disease of children, the elderly, and immunocompromised individuals. Currently, there are no FDA-approved RSV vaccines. The RSV G glycoprotein is used for viral attachment to host cells and impairment of host immunity by interacting with the human chemokine receptor CX3CR1. Antibodies that disrupt this interaction are protective against infection and disease. Nevertheless, development of an RSV G vaccine antigen has been hindered by its low immunogenicity and safety concerns. A previous study described three engineered RSV G proteins containing single-point mutations that induce higher levels of IgG antibodies and have improved safety profiles compared to wild-type RSV G (Fl. C. Bergeron, J. Murray, A. M. Nunez Castrejon, et al., Viruses 13:352, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/v13020352) . However, it is unclear if the mutations affect RSV G protein folding and display of its conformational epitopes. In this study, we show that the RSV G S177Q protein retains high-affinity binding to protective human and mouse monoclonal antibodies and has equal reactivity as wild-type RSV G protein to human reference immunoglobulin to RSV. Additionally, we determined the high-resolution crystal structure of RSV G S177Q protein in complex with the anti-RSV G antibody 3G12, further validating its antigenic structure. These studies show for the first time that an engineered RSV G protein with increased immunogenicity and safety retains conformational epitopes to high-affinity protective antibodies, supporting its further development as an RSV vaccine immunogen. IMPORTANCE Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes severe lower respiratory diseases of children, the elderly, and immunocompromised populations. There currently are no FDA-approved RSV vaccines. Most vaccine development efforts have focused on the RSV F protein, and the field has generally overlooked the receptor-binding antigen RSV G due to its poor immunogenicity and safety concerns. However, single-point mutant RSV G proteins have been previously identified that have increased immunogenicity and safety. In this study, we investigate the antibody reactivities of three known RSV G mutant proteins. We show that one mutant RSV G protein retains high-affinity binding to protective monoclonal antibodies, is equally recognized by anti-RSV antibodies in human sera, and forms the same three-dimensional structure as the wild-type RSV G protein. Our study validates the structure-guided design of the RSV G protein as an RSV vaccine antigen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available