4.6 Article

The Effect of Different Types of Prostate Biopsy Techniques on Post-Biopsy Infectious Complications

Journal

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 208, Issue 1, Pages 109-118

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002497

Keywords

biopsy; image-guided biopsy; infections; perineum; rectum

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) [541001009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of infectious complications between different prostate biopsy techniques with varying number of biopsy cores. The results showed that transperineal prostate biopsy or transrectal prostate biopsy with reduced number of biopsy cores can decrease the risk of infectious complications.
Purpose: The aim of our study was to compare infectious complication rates between different prostate biopsy techniques with various number of biopsy cores. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, all patients from 2 hospitals who underwent prostate biopsy between 2012 and 2019 were identified. Cohorts with different types of prostate biopsies were compiled within these hospitals. Primary outcome measure was any registered infectious complication within 7 days post-biopsy. Secondary outcomes were infectious complications within 30 days, hospitalization and bacteremia. To compare the risk of infection following different prostate biopsy techniques, data was fitted into a logistic regression model adjusting for potential confounders. Results: In total, 4,233 prostate biopsies in 3,707 patients were included. After systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSPB; 12 +/- 1.4 biopsy cores), 4.0% (2,607) of all patients had infectious complications within 7 days post-biopsy. Transperineal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy (16 +/- 3.7 biopsy cores) was associated with significantly lower infection rates than systematic TRUSPB (adjusted OR: 0.29 [0.09-0.73] 95% confidence interval [CI]). Transrectal targeted MRI-ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy (3.1 +/- 0.8 biopsy cores) and transrectal targeted in-bore MRI guided prostate biopsy (2.8 +/- 0.8 biopsy cores) also showed fewer infectious complications than systematic TRUSPB (adjusted OR: 0.41 [0.12-1.12] 95% CI and 0.68 [0.37-1.20] 95% CI, respectively). Conclusions: Transperineal prostate biopsy, or transrectal prostate biopsy with reduced number of biopsy cores, could lower the risk of infectious complications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available