4.6 Review

Penile Transplantation: Lessons Learned and Technical Considerations

Journal

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 207, Issue 5, Pages 960-968

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002504

Keywords

penis; transplantation; vascularized composite allotransplantation; microsurgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Penile vascularized composite allotransplantation is an effective tool for penile reconstruction, but it carries its own ethical, surgical, and medical complications. Only 5 attempts have been made and unique surgical considerations are necessary.
Purpose: Penile vascularized composite allotransplantation is a powerful tool for penile reconstruction. Traditional methods of reconstruction utilizing free tissue and prostheses have well-known complications, can require reoperation and cannot truly emulate the natural form or function of the penis. While vascularized composite allotransplantation may alleviate these difficulties, penile transplantation carries its own ethical, surgical and medical complications. To date, the procedure has only been attempted 5 times. Broader use of this procedure requires unique surgical considerations. We present the first comprehensive, detailed review of this procedure in order to present lessons learned from both our own and the global experience. Materials and Methods: A review of published reports of penile transplant methods and outcomes was conducted to compile lessons learned from these cases. Results: Five penile transplant cases have been reported in literature, 4 with published methodology and outcomes data. All 4 detailed unique surgical approaches and postoperative immunosuppressive regimens. Three of these cases resulted in successful sensory and functional outcomes. Conclusions: Though all 4 analyzed cases employed unique anastomotic and immunosuppressive approaches, 3 resulted in successful recovery of penile urinary and sexual function. Still, specific approaches used by different teams circumvented otherwise common complications, and these differences should guide future research and penile transplant cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available