4.4 Article

Influence of the Nozzle Inner Geometry on the Particle History During Cold Spray Process

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL SPRAY TECHNOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 1776-1791

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11666-022-01407-y

Keywords

cold spray; deposition behavior; fluid dynamics; long nozzle shape; particle history; particle rebound; polymer

Funding

  1. Institute of Fluid Science at Tohoku University [J19Ly01, J20Ly03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of reducing the cross-section area of the nozzle by 20% at the center of a 240-mm-long nozzle in cold spray process was analyzed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). It was found that particles with a diameter larger than 30 μm rebound inside the nozzle, leading to their upstream movement and recording higher temperature and lower velocity.
High particle temperature and low particle velocity are required to successfully deposit polymer particles by cold spray process. To increase the particle temperature, a solution is to use a relatively long nozzle to increase the particle resident time inside the nozzle and limit the expansion of the supersonic flow. However, to do this, due to manufacturing limitations, several nozzles must be attached in series (until the desired length is reached), or alternatively, irregularities must be introduced into the inner shape of the nozzle. In this study, we aim to analyze the effect of 20% nozzle reduction of cross-section area at the center of a 240-mm-long nozzle using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). At the intersection between the two sections, several phenomena take place: (i) the flow chokes and (ii) particles rebound at the intersection leading them to go upstream. For particles with a diameter larger than 30 mu m, 20 to 25% of the particles rebound inside the nozzle due to the larger influence of the inertia and the Saffman lift force. For these particles, larger temperature and lower velocity is recorded.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available