4.5 Article

Heuristics to optimize total completion time subject to makespan in no-wait flow shops with sequence-dependent setup times

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages 362-373

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2022.2039569

Keywords

Flow shop; no-wait; sequence-dependent setup; total completion time; makespan; greedy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes four algorithms for the no-wait flow shop scheduling problem, addressing the problem with sequence-dependent setup times. The algorithms improve the incumbent solution through a process of destruction and repair, exploring search intensification-diversification at different levels. Computational experiments demonstrate that the best proposed algorithm significantly outperforms existing methods.
We propose four algorithms for the no-wait flow shop scheduling problem. The objective is minimizing total completion time such that makespan is not greater than a maximum value. We address the problem with sequence-dependent setup times, an important production constraint that has never been considered for this problem before. The proposed algorithms start from an initial solution and then iterate through a process that destroys and repairs the incumbent solution in order to improve it. The methods are build combining distinct destruction and construction mechanisms, where the search intensification-diversification is explored at different levels. After an initial assessment, the best proposed algorithm (IG(4)) is chosen to be compared with three literature methods (PAL, TOB, ISA-2) developed for similar problems. Computational experiments revealed that the overall average relative percentage deviation of PAL, TOB, ISA-2, and IG(4) are 10.97%, 4.44%, 2.07%, and 0.36%, respectively. The statistical analysis confirms that IG(4) significantly outperforms the existing methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available