4.3 Article

Effects of paired stimulation with specific waveforms on cortical and spinal plasticity in subjects with a chronic spinal cord injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 121, Issue 10, Pages 2044-2056

Publisher

ELSEVIER TAIWAN
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2022.02.016

Keywords

Spinal cord injury (SCI); Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); Transspinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS); Paired stimulation (PS); Motor evoked potential (MEP)

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [110-2314-B-038-001, 110-2314-B-305-001, 110-2811-E-038-500-MY3, 109-2221-E-038-005-MY3, 109-2314-B-038-132]
  2. University System of Taipei Joint Research Program [USTP-NTUT-TMU-111-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the effects of different waveforms using paired stimulations with bicycling in subjects with a chronic spinal cord injury (SCI).
Background/Purpose: Paired stimulation can cause neuroplasticity in corticospinal and spinal pathways in subjects with a chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). We aimed to know the effects of different waveforms using paired stimulations with bicycling in subjects with a chronic SCI.Methods: Recruited subjects with an SCI underwent three treatment interventions in random order for 4-20 min followed by 30 min of bicycling (control, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS; rTMS) at 20 Hz with transspinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS), and inter-mittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) with tsDCS with a 1-week gap period. A TMS method was employed to record the resting motor threshold (RMT), the 90% values of which was used as the stimulation intensity, and the Hoffman (H)-reflex was measured by stimulating the tibial nerve in the popliteal fossa. The RMT, motor evoked potential (MEP) latency, MEP peak-to-peak amplitude, and H-reflex latency as primary variables and lower extremity motor scale (LEMS) and modified Ashworth spasticity scale (MAS) as secondary variables were analyzed before and after the interventions.Results: The MEP latency, MEP amplitude, and LEMS significantly improved with the rTMS-iTBS/ tsDCS or the rTMS-20 Hz/tsDCS (p < 0.050) protocols compared to the control intervention. All other outcome measures, including RMT, H-reflex latency, and MAS score showed some changes but did not fully attain a level of significance.Conclusion: The paired stimulation with rTMS-iTBS/tsDCS was equally effective to produce neuroplastic effect in subjects with chronic SCI compared to the conventional TMS-20 Hz/ tsDCS intervention.Copyright 2022, Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available