4.3 Article

Studying avian encephalization with geometric morphometrics

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANATOMY
Volume 229, Issue 2, Pages 191-203

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/joa.12476

Keywords

allometry; Aves; brain; encephalization; geometric morphometrics

Funding

  1. National Evolutionary Synthesis Center [NSF EF-0905606]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Spain [CGL2013-42643-P]
  3. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
  4. Comparative Biology program at the Richard Gilder Graduate School and Division of Paleontology (American Museum of Natural History)
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1406849] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Encephalization is a core concept in comparative neurobiology, aiming to quantify the neurological capacity of organisms. For measuring encephalization, many studies have employed relative brain sizes corrected for expected allometric scaling to body size. Here we highlight the utility of a multivariate geometric morphometric (GM) approach for visualizing and analyzing neuroanatomical shape variation associated with encephalization. GM readily allows the statistical evaluation of covariates, such as size, and many software tools exist for visualizing their effects on shape. Thus far, however, studies using GM have not attempted to translate the meaning of encephalization to shape data. As such, we tested the statistical relationship between size and encephalization quotients (EQs) to brain shape utilizing a broad interspecific sample of avian endocranial data. Although statistically significant, the analyses indicate that allometry accounts for <10% of total neuroanatomical shape variation. Notably, we find that EQs, despite being corrected for allometric scaling based on size, contain size-related neuroanatomical shape changes. In addition, much of what is traditionally considered encephalization comprises clade-specific trends in relative forebrain expansion, particularly driven by landbirds. EQs, therefore, fail to capture 90% of the total neuroanatomical variation after correcting for allometry and shared phylogenetic history. Moving forward, GM techniques provide crucial tools for investigating key drivers of this vast, largely unexplored aspect of avian brain morphology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available