4.4 Article

A comparison of the rheological behavior of xanthan gum and diutan gum aqueous solutions

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40430-022-03406-0

Keywords

Biopolymers; Xanthan gum; Diutan gum; Rheology; Pseudoplastic; Viscoelastic

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, CNPq
  2. CAPES

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a thorough rheology characterization of aqueous solutions of xanthan and diutan gums, and obtained information about their rheological properties at different temperatures. The Power Law model fits the pseudoplastic behavior of these solutions well. The aqueous solution of xanthan gum exhibits a gel behavior, while the aqueous solution of diutan gum forms a gel structure. Xanthan gum solution shows thermal degradation, while diutan gum solution exhibits good thermal stability.
It was conducted thorough rheology characterization of aqueous solutions of xanthan and diutan gums, obtaining the following rheological properties: viscosity; elastic modulus, viscous modulus, complex modulus and complex viscosity, in different temperatures. The Power Law model fits very well the pseudoplastic behavior of aqueous solutions of xanthan and diutan gums. The elastic modulus (G'), in the case of aqueous solution of xanthan gum, shows larger values compared to viscous modulus (G), indicating a gel behavior. For the aqueous solution of diutan gum, there is a crossover of the curves of G' and G, in the frequency sweep test, corresponding to a gel structure formation (G' > G). The aqueous solution of xanthan gum shows thermal degradation while aqueous solution of diutan gum shows good thermal stability. The study of rheology of aqueous solutions of xanthan gum and diutan gum can contribute to better understanding the flow behavior of these biopolymers that have many industrial and scientific applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available