4.6 Article

Development and validation of predictive models for COVID-19 outcomes in a safety-net hospital population

Journal

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac062

Keywords

COVID-19; AI; predictive modeling; racial bias; social determinants of health

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IIS-1914792, DMS-1664644, CNS1645681]
  2. Office of Naval Research [N0001419-1-2571]
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM135930]
  4. Boston University Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) under NIH/NCATS [UL54 TR004130]
  5. Boston University Rafik B. Hariri Institute for Computing and Computational Science and Engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed predictive models for COVID-19 outcomes using a racially diverse patient population with high social needs. The models accurately predicted the severity of COVID-19, taking into account the dynamic evolution of vital signs. The study also highlighted the influence of race, social determinants of health, and hospital occupancy on the outcomes.
Objective To develop predictive models of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes, elucidate the influence of socioeconomic factors, and assess algorithmic racial fairness using a racially diverse patient population with high social needs. Materials and Methods Data included 7,102 patients with positive (RT-PCR) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 test at a safety-net system in Massachusetts. Linear and nonlinear classification methods were applied. A score based on a recurrent neural network and a transformer architecture was developed to capture the dynamic evolution of vital signs. Combined with patient characteristics, clinical variables, and hospital occupancy measures, this dynamic vital score was used to train predictive models. Results Hospitalizations can be predicted with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 92% using symptoms, hospital occupancy, and patient characteristics, including social determinants of health. Parsimonious models to predict intensive care, mechanical ventilation, and mortality that used the most recent labs and vitals exhibited AUCs of 92.7%, 91.2%, and 94%, respectively. Early predictive models, using labs and vital signs closer to admission had AUCs of 81.1%, 84.9%, and 92%, respectively. Discussion The most accurate models exhibit racial bias, being more likely to falsely predict that Black patients will be hospitalized. Models that are only based on the dynamic vital score exhibited accuracies close to the best parsimonious models, although the latter also used laboratories. Conclusions This large study demonstrates that COVID-19 severity may accurately be predicted using a score that accounts for the dynamic evolution of vital signs. Further, race, social determinants of health, and hospital occupancy play an important role.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available