4.5 Article

Transcutaneous Laryngeal Ultrasonography for Assessing Vocal Cord Twitch Response in Thyroid Operation during Predissection Vagus Nerve Stimulation

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
Volume 234, Issue 3, Pages 359-366

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000053

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to report the experience with the use of intraoperative transcutaneous laryngeal ultrasonography (TLUSG) in evaluating vocal cord twitch response in thyroid surgeries and compared it with laryngeal twitch palpation (LTP). TLUSG showed better reliability in assessing vocal cord twitch response compared to LTP, providing practical troubleshooting guidance for patients with no intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) signals.
BACKGROUND In this study, we aimed to report our experience with the use of intraoperative transcutaneous laryngeal ultrasonography (TLUSG) to evaluate the vocal cord twitch response during predissection vagus nerve stimulation in thyroid surgeries and examine the reliability of this technique when compared with that of laryngeal twitch palpation (LTP). STUDY DESIGN The prospective data collection of consecutive patients who underwent open thyroidectomy with intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) was reviewed retrospectively. We recorded the electromyographic activity and assessed the vocal cord twitch response on LTP, TLUSG. We compared the accessibility, sensitivity, and specificity of the techniques. RESULTS A total of 110 patients (38 men and 72 women) with 134 nerves at risk were enrolled. The vocal cord was assessable by TLUSG in 103 (93.6%) patients and by LTP in 64 (59.1%) patients. Two patients showed negative predissection IONM signal but positive on TLUSG and the presence of laryngeal twitch response confirmed by laryngoscopy. Fourteen patients showed positive IONM signals and presence of the vocal cord twitch response on TLUSG but not on LTP. The sensitivity and specificity were 70.21% and 100%, respectively, for LTP, and those both were 100% for TLUSG. For patients who could be assessed using both techniques, TLUSG had better accuracy than LTP (100% vs 80.33%, p = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS The innovative intraoperative application of TLUSG is better for evaluating the laryngeal twitch response than LTP. This technique provides practical troubleshooting guidance for patients with no IONM signals during predissection vagus nerve stimulation. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Surgeons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available