4.7 Editorial Material

Peripheral Artery Disease The New and Old Silent Killer COMMENT

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 79, Issue 13, Pages 1236-1238

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.006

Keywords

cardiogenic shock; coronary artery bypass grafting; mechanical circulatory support; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention; peripheral artery disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cardiogenic shock is a serious complication in patients with acute myocardial infarction, and patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease may have higher mortality risk. Currently, there is a lack of data on the outcomes of these patients.
Cardiogenic shock (CS) complicates up to 10% of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), with one-third of those affected not surviving to hospital discharge.1 Given its shared risk factors with coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral artery disease (PAD) is often seen in patients presenting with AMI.2 Over the past decade, admissions for PAD have increased in the United States, accompanied by persistent high rates of morbidity and mortality.3 Patients presenting with CS from AMI carry the highest risk of mortality when undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), but they may also bear the greatest benefit from intervention.4 Those with comorbid PAD may represent a particularly high-risk group, potentially because of higher atherosclerotic burden and vascular access limitations for revascularization. However, no data are available on the outcomes of patients presenting with CS from AMI with comorbid PAD. To this end, in this issue of the Journal of the the morbidity and mortality associated with PAD

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available