4.7 Article

Characteristics of a resonant iris microwave induced nitrogen plasma

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages 1097-1104

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ja00066e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Agilent Technologies
  2. Wake Forest University
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES, Brazil) [99999.002566/2014-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we use the Boltzmann plot, Saha's equation and the Mg II/Mg I signal ratio to determine temperature (T), electron number density (ne) and robustness of different regions of a microwave-induced nitrogen plasma. A 2-D profile based on plasma observation position and nebulization flow rate is generated for each of these properties and their effects on sensitivity, accuracy and matrix-related interferences in microwave-induced plasma optical emission spectrometry (MIP OES) are evaluated. Plasma temperatures vary between 4220 and 5360 K by changing nebulization flow rate and plasma observation position. These same instrumental parameters are varied to produce ne values in the 0.473.72 X 10(13) cm(-3) range, and Mg II/Mg I ratios between 0.26 and 2.01. Limits of detection (LODs) were calculated for different T and ne conditions, and for analytes with a wide range of Esum values (Esum = ionization energy + excitation energy). The best LODs were calculated for determinations at high ne plasma regions. More robust plasma conditions allowed for more accurate results when determining analytes with Esum > 9 eV or < 3 eV. For intermediate Esum elements, the best recoveries in complex sample analyses were obtained at high ne conditions. Although the microwave applied power is fixed at 1000 W for the commercial MIP OES evaluated, one can still control plasma conditions by varying other operating parameters, which may contribute to fewer matrix effects, better accuracies and lower LODs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available