4.6 Article

Increased relative proportions of advanced melanoma among veterans: A comparative analysis with the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages 72-79

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.02.063

Keywords

immunotherapy; melanoma; mortality; Surveillance; Epidemiology and End Results (SEER); survival; US Department of Veterans Affairs; Veterans Affairs Cancer Registry

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Veterans with melanoma are diagnosed at later stages, but there has been recent improvement in stage IV MSS.
Background: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program reflects a third of the population of the United States. However, SEER may not be generalizable to the veteran population. Because veterans comprise a high-risk population, this discrepancy may limit our understanding of the epidemiology of melanoma in such high-risk populations. Objectives: To assess differences in demographics, tumor characteristics, and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) in veterans compared to the general population. Methods: Data were collected from the Veterans Affairs Cancer Registry (VACR) and SEER (18 registries) from 2009 to 2017. Results: We identified 15,334 veterans and 166,265 SEER patients with melanoma. Veterans were more likely to present with regional or distant disease (17.5% vs 13.0% in SEER). In VACR relative to SEER, the 5-year MSS was lower across all ages, except those diagnosed at >= 80 years. From 2009 to 2017, MSS by stage was lower across all stages in VACR. However, for stage IV melanomas diagnosed in 2015 to 2017 compared to 2011-2014, 2-year MSS increased from 37.8% to 51.5% in VACR versus 36.4% to 44.8% in SEER. Limitations: Unique veteran demographics and missing data inherent to VACR. Conclusion: Compared to SEER, veterans with melanoma were diagnosed at later stages; however, both exhibited recent improvement in stage IV MSS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available