4.2 Article

Analysis of Surgery Residency Website Content: Implications during the COVID-19 Era

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION
Volume 79, Issue 4, Pages 904-908

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.03.006

Keywords

Surgical education; Website; Wellness; Fellowship match; COVID-19

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surgical residency program websites play a crucial role in providing information to prospective applicants. However, many websites lack important content, such as fellowship match results and resident wellness, which are crucial for applicant decision-making. University-based programs tend to include more of this information on their websites.
BACKGROUND: Surgery residency program websites (SRW) are an important source of information for prospective applicants. The COVID-19 pandemic spurred a pivot from the traditional in-person interview format to interviews via virtual platforms. Because of the inability to meet in person, the information provided on program websites takes on an increased relevance to applicants. We hypothesized that SRW may be missing content important to applicants. Our study aims to assess SRW for the content which impacts the applicant decision making process. METHODS: An internal survey distributed to fourth-year medical students in 2020 at a single academic institution identified the website content most important to applicants. A list of ACGME-accredited SRW as of December 1, 2020 was obtained. Using the Fellowship and Residency Electronic and Interactive Database, websites were assessed for content parameters identified by the survey. RESULTS: Medical students applying to surgical specialties identified fellowship acquisition (94%), faculty information (88%), application contact information (82%), and resident wellness (77%) as the most important web site content. Review of SRW websites identified content pertaining to fellowship acquisition and resident wellness in only 60% and 27% of cases respectively. Overall, the SRW of university programs included the most content parameters, followed by hybrid programs, then community programs. CONCLUSIONS: Many SRW are missing information that applicants deem important in their decision-making process. Most notably, there is a relative deficiency in information pertaining to fellowship match results and resident wellness. University based programs tend to include more of this information on their websites. SRW should continue to adapt to meet the needs of applicants in an increasingly virtual age. (C) 2022 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available