4.5 Article

Products, pathways, and kinetics for catalytic hydrodenitrogenation of quinoline in hydrothermal condition

Journal

JOURNAL OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS
Volume 182, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2021.105509

Keywords

Hydrothermal; Hydrodenitrogenation; Quinoline; Kinetics; Catalyst

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [51876174]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20190221]
  3. Shaanxi Market Supervision Science and Technology Project in 2020,China [2020KY07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the reaction mechanism and kinetics of catalytic hydrodenitrogenation (HDN) of quinoline under hydrothermal conditions using Ni-Ru/gamma-Al2O3 catalyst and formic acid as hydrogen donor. The results show that quinoline conversion follows first-order kinetics, with the dehydrogenation of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline to quinoline being the rate-determining step. 2-hexene is the major denitrogenated product, primarily derived from hydrogenation of aniline with a higher formation rate from decahydroquinoline than from aniline derivatives. The catalyst, Ni-Ru bimetallic catalyst, is relatively unstable under supercritical water conditions.
The purpose of this study is to investigate reaction mechanism and kinetics of catalytic hydrodenitrogenation (HDN) of quinoline under hydrothermal conditions (300 degrees C, 350 degrees C, and 400 degrees C), using Ni-Ru/gamma-Al2O3 catalyst and formic acid (FA) as hydrogen donor. 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline, decahydroquinoline, aniline, methyl aniline, 2-hexene, and toluene were primary products. Quinoline conversion fits a first-order kinetics, with an activation energy of 41.72 kJ/mol. A possible reaction network of HDN of quinoline was developed and the corresponding kinetic model captures nearly all the temporal variation of all major products' concentration. The kinetic modeling results indicated that the dehydrogenation of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline to quinoline is the rate-determining step with high energy barrier of 174.6 kJ/mol. Reaction rate analysis showed 2-hexene as the major denitrogenated product is mainly derived from hydrogenation of aniline and its formation rate from decahydroquinoline is higher than the path from aniline derivatives. Sensitivity study revealed that hydrogenation from quinoline to decahydroquinoline has a strong influence on the whole reaction process. Both catalyst durability test and catalyst characterizations demonstrated that the Ni-Ru bimetallic catalyst was relatively unstable under supercritical water conditions, probably due to the joint influences of partial agglomeration of active metal and hydrolysis of supporter gamma-Al2O3.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available