4.7 Article

An effective impedance for modelling the aeroacoustic coupling of ducts connected via apertures

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION
Volume 520, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2021.116622

Keywords

Array of coupled ducts; Bloch-wave theory; Aeroacoustics

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [422037803]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study derives an effective impedance that models the aeroacoustic coupling between periodic arrays of ducts communicating via apertures, which can simplify theoretical and computational analysis of the dynamics of these arrays. The derived impedance embeds new features and dependencies on parameters such as the grazing flow Mach number and aperture extension.
An effective impedance that models the aeroacoustic coupling between periodic arrays of ducts that communicate via apertures is derived. A lumped description of the interaction between the one-dimensional acoustics in the ducts and the transverse unsteady fluctuations in the connecting apertures is exploited in the derivation of the impedance. This configuration is of relevance for some industrial applications, for example to model the aeroacoustic coupling between cans in gas turbines equipped with can-annular combustors. The derived impedance can be used as a Bloch-type boundary condition to reduce theoretical and computational analysis on the dynamics of these arrays of ducts to a single duct. After the derivation of a general result, simpler limits of interest are discussed. For some of these limits, impedance models are available in the literature. It is shown how the effective impedance derived in this study reduces to already available models in these limits, but more generally embeds new features, including the explicit dependence of the impedance on the grazing flow Mach number and the finite extension of the apertures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available