4.6 Article

Hierarchical zeolites as efficient catalysts for dehydration of substituted indanols

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY
Volume 309, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2022.122942

Keywords

Hierarchical zeolites; Indanols; Selective dehydration; Indene; Acid sites

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Ukraine [2020.02/0335]
  2. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hierarchical zeolites with different topology and morphology were evaluated for the dehydration of a series of substituted 4-bromo-2-alkyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-indan-1-ols. Optimal acid sites strength was found to be crucial for high conversion and selectivity, while stronger or weaker acidity led to undesired by-products or low conversion rates. Medium strength acid sites were identified as preferable for selective dehydration of the substrates.
Hierarchical zeolites of different topology and morphology (Al-, Ga- and B-silicate zeolites of MOR, BEA, MFI and MTW structural types with the morphology of aggregated nanosheets, nanorods, or close to spherical nanoparticles) were evaluated in the dehydration of a homologous series of substituted 4-bromo-2-alkyl-2,3-dihydro1H-indan-1-ols. The optimal strength of the catalyst's acid sites providing both high indanols conversion and selectivity towards indenes (up to 99%) was found for each of the studied substrates. Stronger acid sites than optimal ones resulted in the formation of by-products of self-alkylation of the initial indanols by the formed indenes or alkylation of benzene used as a solvent. Weak acidity of the catalysts led to low substrate conversion and the presence of the corresponding ether. A correlation between the catalyst acidity and the yield of the desired product was found. Medium strength acid sites were discovered to be preferable for the selective dehydration of substituted 4-bromo-2,3-dihydro-1H-indan-1-ol.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available