4.3 Article

Graph theory and nighttime imagery based microgrid design

Journal

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0083188

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0003525]
  2. Department of Energy's Office of Electricity
  3. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper develops a systematic procedure to address the engineering challenge of reducing the duration and frequency of blackouts in remote communities by creating microgrids and prioritizing high value assets within vulnerable communities. The study uses nighttime satellite imagery to identify vulnerable communities, and employs an asset classification and rating system to prioritize multi-asset clusters within these communities. Infrastructure data, geographic information systems, satellite imagery, and spectral clustering are utilized to form and rank microgrid candidates, with a microgrid sizing algorithm included to guide the design process.
Reducing the duration and frequency of blackouts in remote communities poses an engineering challenge for grid operators. Outage effects can also be mitigated locally through microgrids. This paper develops a systematic procedure to account for these challenges by creating microgrids prioritizing high value assets within vulnerable communities. Nighttime satellite imagery is used to identify vulnerable communities. Using an asset classification and rating system, multi-asset clusters within these communities are prioritized. Infrastructure data, geographic information systems, satellite imagery, and spectral clustering are used to form and rank microgrid candidates. A microgrid sizing algorithm is included to guide through the microgrid design process. An application of the methodology is presented using real event, location, and asset data. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available