4.3 Article

Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology Consensus Guidelines of combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for gynecological cancers

Journal

JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages 402-411

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrac011

Keywords

JASTRO Guidelines; intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (IC; IS); cervical cancer; brachytherapy; consensus guidelines; gynecologic cancers

Funding

  1. Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the effectiveness and safety of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (IC/IS) in treating large and irregularly shaped uterine cervical cancer patients. Compared to conventional intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT), IC/IS is more invasive and thus has a slower implementation speed. The article aims to provide practical and comprehensive guidance for radiation oncologists and medical physicists who wish to start IC/IS, and to accelerate the nationwide utilization of IC/IS by sharing the Japanese approach to managing locally advanced uterine cervical cancer.
It has been postulated that the combination of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (IC/IS) is effective and safe for large and irregularly shaped uterine cervical cancer patients. However, due to its invasiveness compared to conventional intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT), it has to be said that the implementation speed of IC/IS is slow. Until now, there have been no guidelines for required equipment, human resources, and procedural guide focusing solely on IC/IS. The purpose of this guideline is to provide radiation oncologists and medical physicists who wish to start IC/IS with practical and comprehensive guidance for a safe IC/IS introduction and to help accelerate the spread of the utilization of IC/IS nationwide. This is the English translation of the Japanese IC/IS Guidelines, and it was created in an effort to share the Japanese approach to the management of locally advanced uterine cervical cancer worldwide.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available