4.7 Article

Impact of Carbon Source Supplementations on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Physiology

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 1392-1407

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00936

Keywords

Pseudomonas aeruginosa; carbon sources; virulence; antibiotic resistance; biofilm; physiological changes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the impact of various carbon source supplementations on the physiology of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 strain was investigated using a global proteomic approach and phenotypic assays. The results showed that citrate supplementation enhanced the virulence, motility, biofilm development, and antibiotic resistance of the strain.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen highly resistant to a wide range of antimicrobial agents, making its infections very difficult to treat. Since microorganisms need to perpetually adapt to their surrounding environment, understanding the effect of carbon sources on P. aeruginosa physiology is therefore essential to avoid increasing drug-resistance and better fight this pathogen. By a global proteomic approach and phenotypic assays, we investigated the impact of various carbon source supplementations (glucose, glutamate, succinate, and citrate) on the physiology of the P. aeruginosa PA14 strain. A total of 581 proteins were identified as differentially expressed in the 4 conditions. Most of them were more abundant in citrate supplementation and were involved in virulence, motility, biofilm development, and antibiotic resistance. Phenotypic assays were performed to check these hypotheses. By coupling all this data, we highlight the importance of the environment in which the bacterium evolves on its metabolism, and thus the necessity to better understand the metabolic pathways implied in its adaptative response according to the nutrient availability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available