4.8 Article

Revealing the unconventional lithium storage mechanism of ordered mesoporous NiO for lithium-ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 526, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231135

Keywords

Lithium-ion batteries; Ordered mesoporous materials; Nickel oxide; Abnormal capacity; Nanostructured electrodes

Funding

  1. Samsung Research Funding & Incuba-tion Center of Samsung Electronics [MA1401-52]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a highly ordered mesoporous NiO electrode material with high reversible capacity is fabricated. The reversible capacity is attributed to both the conversion reaction of NiO framework and the reversible electrolyte derived surface layer.
Transition metal oxides have been intensively developed for use as anode materials to overcome the capacity limitations of commercial graphite. In this study, a highly ordered mesoporous NiO electrode material is fabricated using a hard templating method, and exhibits a reversible capacity of approximately 940 mAh g(-1) that is much higher than the theoretical value based on the conversion reaction (717 mAh g(-1)). Combined analyses that include synchrotron-based X-ray techniques and controlled X-ray photoelectron spectroscopies attribute the lithium storage behaviors to both the conversion reaction of NiO framework and the reversible electrolyte derived surface layer. Interestingly, the contribution of the reversible electrolyte-derived surface layer (-440 mAh g(-1)) to the capacity is comparable to that of the conversion reaction with NiO (-500 mAh g(-1)). The results also demonstrate that incomplete conversion occurs due to the high bonding energy of Ni-O in the framework during the electrochemical reaction, and prove that the distinctive nano-structural characteristics of the mesoporous NiO surface cause the reversible behavior of the electrolyte-derived surface layer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available