4.8 Article

Membrane fouling in aqueous redox flow batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 527, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231180

Keywords

Redox flow batteries; Membrane fouling; Ion-exchange membrane

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore under its Investigatorship Programme [NRF-NRFI2018-06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are a reliable and durable grid-scale electricity storage technology. The performance and cost of RFB systems are largely determined by the ion-exchange membrane (IEM), which is a critical component of RFBs. This study investigates the origin and impact of membrane fouling on RFB systems, providing useful guidance for membrane selection and optimization.
Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are considered as a promising technology for reliable and durable grid-scale electricity storage. Ion-exchange membrane (IEM), as a critical component of RFBs, largely dictates the performance, durability and cost of RFB systems. Membrane fouling has frequently been observed in aqueous RFBs when IEM are employed with different redox electrolytes. However, very few studies have been conducted on its origin and the profound impact to the device performance. Based on several representative redox molecules and IEMs that are commonly used in aqueous pH neutral RFBs, we investigate the effect and mechanism of membrane fouling. Extensive electrochemical and spectroscopic characterizations reveal that the fouling of IEMs generally involves redox species possessing the same charge as the counterions of membrane and having a large partition coefficient, which accumulate inside the membrane and at the membrane/electrolyte interface, blocking the ion exchange sites in the membrane and creating an electric field at the interface inhibiting ion transport. These findings provide useful guidance to membrane selection and optimization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available