4.8 Article

Power and energy capacity tradeoffs in an all-aqueous copper thermally regenerative ammonia battery

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 531, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231339

Keywords

Thermally regenerative battery; Energy density; Flow battery; Energy efficiency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thermally regenerative ammonia batteries (TRABs) can generate electrical power from low-grade waste heat. Recent advancements using copper-based electrolytes have led to higher power densities. The study demonstrates that adjusting the electrolyte composition and discharge currents can further enhance power and energy density.
Thermally regenerative ammonia batteries (TRABs) can provide energy storage and produce electrical power from low-grade waste heat instead of electricity. The use of all-aqueous copper-based electrolytes has recently produced higher power densities than those achieved using previous TRAB approaches based on reversible metal deposition and dissolution processes, but further gains are possible in power and energy density. We investigated the limitations of power and energy density and how they are impacted by the electrolyte composition and discharge currents. By increasing the ammonia concentration from 1 to 5 M, the power density of the battery increased from 11.2 to 28.5 mW cm-2, but the energy density decreased from 0.56 to 0.31 Wh L-1. Increasing discharge current densities from 4 to 12.5 mA cm-2 increased the average power density during discharge from 2.4 to 5.9 mW cm-2 without appreciable losses in energy density. Increasing the copper concentration from 0.1 to 0.5 M increased both energy density to 2.15 Wh L-1 and energy efficiency to 2.2% but did not substantially impact the power density. These results represent the highest performance metrics achieved for a low-grade waste heat to electricity system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available