4.6 Article

Theoretical design of ultracompact three-dimensional isotropic two-photon 4Pi STED microscopy based on multifunctional metalenses focusing system

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 55, Issue 30, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ac654c

Keywords

multifunctional metalens; two-photon excitation; 4Pi STED microscopy; three-dimensional isotropic resolution; deep imaging

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62175186, 62027812]
  2. Tianjin Municipal Education Commission [2019KJ107]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes an ultracompact two-photon 4Pi STED microscopy using metalenses to overcome the limitations of studying synapses in deep brain tissue, and achieves three-dimensional isotropic super-resolution imaging.
4Pi stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy shows outstanding three-dimensional (3D) isotropic super-resolution imaging performance. However, this technology is still difficult for achieving long-term studying of the synapses that are deeply embedded inside brain tissue. Metalens, which can realize arbitrary nanoscale amplitude, phase, and polarization modulations, is a very useful tool to solve this limitation. In this paper, an ultracompact two-photon 4Pi STED microscopy involved two multifunctional metalenses patterned on the two fiber facets respectively for focusing the excitation and depletion laser beams to the same position was proposed to realize the 3D isotropic super-resolution imaging. The designed complementary structure of two metalenses and the optimized pupil ratio beta assured the symmetry of the STED spot. Furthermore, the isotropic super-resolution of 27 nm was theoretically implemented based on the two-photon STED theoretical model. Our approach will greatly increase the viability of the 3D super-resolution morphological imaging in the deep brain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available