4.5 Article

Valence control of charge and orbital frustrated system YbFe2O4 with electrochemical Li+ intercalation

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110468

Keywords

RFe2O4; YbFe2O4; Triangular lattice; Charge frustration; Spin frustration; Orbital frustration; Frustration control; Li doping

Funding

  1. KAKENHI [19H01827, 20H02829]
  2. Ritsumeikan SR (2016) [R1501]
  3. [2018A3609]
  4. [2018B3611]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20H02829, 19H01827] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An attempt was made to control the valence of mixed valence iron triangular oxide YbFe2O4 through electrochemical doping of Li +. Systematic changes in lattice constant and Fe - Fe, Fe-Yb distances were observed with maximum doping exceeding 300 mAh/g. However, detailed observation of the iron valence state of YbFe2O4 was hindered by signal overlap from iron metal nano particles.
We report an attempt valence control of the mixed valence iron triangular oxide YbFe2O4 to develop an effective technique controling the frustration of charges in strongly correlated electron systems. The electrochemical doping of Li + into YbFe2O4 was examined on a cell-type sample similar to the Li-ion secondary battery cell. Systematic changes in the lattice constant and Fe - Fe and Fe-Yb distance were observed with Li doping. Maximum value of the doping was over 300 mAh/g. An EXAFS experiment indicated that Li positioned between Yb octahedron layer (U-layer) and Fe-bipyramidal layer (W-layer). However, detailed change of iron valence state of YbFe2O4was not clearly observed because of the superimpose of the signal from iron metal nano particles in XANES observation. We discuss that the uncertainty might arise from the inhomogeneous distribution of the sample particle size, which might prevent the homogeneous doping of Li because the doping occurs on the surface of each nano-particles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available