4.8 Article

Local-Average Free Volume Correlates with Dynamics in Glass Formers

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 13, Issue 17, Pages 3957-3964

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00072

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFA0713601]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21790340, 22073092]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS [Y202054]
  4. Hong Kong Quantum AI Lab Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By introducing the concept of local-average free volume, this study reveals the correlation between dynamic heterogeneity and the average local free volume in glass formers, resolving the controversy regarding the role of free volume in particle rearrangements.
Glass formers exhibit a pronounced slowdown in dynamics, accompanied by progressive heterogeneity as they approach the glass transition. There is intense debate over whether the dramatic slowdown is caused by dynamical heterogeneity and whether the enhanced dynamical heterogeneity originates from structural causes. However, the connection between dynamical heterogeneity and the spatial distribution of the single-particle free volume (a purely static structural quantity) was found to be rather weak, which raises the question of whether dynamic heterogeneity has a purely structural origin. Here, by introducing the concept of local-average free volume, we present numerical evidence that long-time dynamic heterogeneity shows significantly enhanced correlation with the average local free volume over a length scale of a few neighboring shells. Our results resolve the long-standing controversy about whether free volume plays an important role in particle rearrangements associated with the activated hopping relaxation. The concept of local average can be applied to other local structural descriptors to better correlate with dynamic heterogeneity in glass-forming liquids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available