4.2 Article

Experimental Study of the Phase Equilibria in the Ternary Ga-Ge-Zn System

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHASE EQUILIBRIA AND DIFFUSION
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages 176-192

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11669-022-00952-x

Keywords

Ga-Ge-Zn system; experimental tests; liquidus projection; phase diagrams

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51950410600]
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [OI172037, 451-03-68/2022-14]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ternary Ga-Ge-Zn system was experimentally and analytically tested in this study. The study is significant due to the importance of germanium-based alloys in the electronic industry and their special application as memory materials. The experimental results were compared with thermodynamic calculations and literature data, showing good agreements and validating the reliability of the calculation method.
In the current study the ternary Ga-Ge-Zn system was experimentally and analytically tested. The ternary system is chosen due to the importance of germanium-based alloys in the electronic industry and their special application as memory materials. There are no previous studies related to the Ga-Ge-Zn system up to this paper. Used experimental techniques were differential thermal analysis, scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectrometry, x-ray powder diffraction, electrical conductivity and hardness tests. The experimentally obtained results were compared with the results of thermodynamic calculation of phase equilibria using the calculation of phase diagram (CALPHAD) method and literature data. Calculated phase diagrams were three vertical sections (Ga-GeZn, Ge-GaZn and Zn-GaGe), three isothermal sections (100, 200 and 300 degrees C) and liquidus projection with invariant reactions. Good agreements between calculated phase diagrams and experimental data have been obtained without introducing ternary thermodynamic parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available