4.5 Article

Geological storage of CO2 and acid gases dissolved at surface in production water

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.110052

Keywords

Production water; Wastewater reinjection; CO2-water-rock reaction; CO2 storage; CO2 impurities

Funding

  1. Australian National Low Emissions Coal Research and Development
  2. Low Emission Technology Australia (LETA)
  3. Australian Government through the Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources
  4. ANLEC RD [7-1115-0268]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The traditional method of geological CO2 storage involves injecting CO2 into a high permeability reservoir capped by a low permeability seal. Another method involves injecting CO2 dissolved in water, which can enhance storage security. Geochemical modeling on different reservoir rocks indicated the potential for both mineral trapping and dissolution trapping of CO2 over time.
During geological CO2 storage traditionally CO2 is injected subsurface into a high permeability reservoir capped by a low permeability seal to trap the buoyant supercritical plume. Wastewater from oil and gas production is also currently disposed of by subsurface injection into suitable reservoirs, most notably in the USA and Canada. Injection of CO2 dissolved in water may both increase storage security by reducing vertical migration and enhancing dissolution and mineral trapping. There is potential for surface dissolution of CO2 into wastewater that is already being stored subsurface. CO2-water-rock reactions in different sandstone or limestone reservoir rocks with either saline coal production water or low salinity water were geochemically modelled. The geochemical potential for mineral trapping of CO2, and associated changes to pH for potential reservoirs is compared. For a mineralogically clean quartz-rich saline sandstone reservoir only 0.18 and 0.20 kg/m3 CO2 was mineral trapped as ankerite and calcite over 30 or 1000 years. Feldspars, clays and carbonate minerals were converted to kaolinite, calcite, ankerite and smectites, as pH increased to 5.65. The specific silicate minerals present controlled mineral trapping potential e.g. with an Fe-rich chlorite present rather than a clinochlore chlorite 6.3 and 6.8 kg/m3 CO2 was trapped at 30 and 1000 years respectively as siderite and ankerite. Disso-lution trapping dominated in the low salinity or limestone reservoirs with minor mineral trapping. The presence of small amounts of SO2 or H2S in the CO2 stream resulted in dissolved S sequestered as elemental S, pyrite, barite, and anhydrite. The effects of low CO2 content or potential reservoir cooling induced by injection fluids were also investigated. The low pH of the injection fluid could potentially corrode legacy wellbores, one solution is a form of amendment such as liming to neutralise pH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available