4.7 Article

On the use of cryomilling and spark plasma sintering to achieve high strength in a magnesium alloy

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 688, Issue -, Pages 1141-1150

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.162

Keywords

Magnesium alloy; Cryomilling; Spark plasma sintering; Hall-Petch effect; Grain refinement

Funding

  1. University of Sheffield postgraduate scholarship
  2. EPSRC [EP/L025213/1]
  3. CSC (China Scholarship Council)
  4. EPSRC [EP/L025213/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L025213/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bulk nanostructured magnesium alloy AZ31 has been produced by spark plasma sintering at four different temperatures from 350 to 450 degrees C. The effect of sintering temperature on microstructural evolution and compression behaviour was studied in detail. It was concluded that the sample consolidated at 400 degrees C exhibited the highest strength. Higher sintering temperature (450 degrees C) improved the compressive strain of the bulk sample but at the sacrifice of strength. However, samples consolidated at 350 degrees C displayed brittle behaviour with low strength. All consolidated samples had a bimodal microstructure with nanocrystalline and coarse grains. The nanocrystalline microstructure formed by cryomilling was retained after consolidation and a maximum microhardness was approximately 150 HV. The bulk samples consolidated at 400 degrees C with an average grain size of 45 nm showed exceptional average true compressive yield strength of 400.7 MPa, true ultimate compressive strength of 499.7 MPa, which was superior to published results for most of conventional magnesium alloys. Although nanostructured materials usually have high strength but poor ductility, the material in this study exhibited high strength and a true compressive strain of 0.036. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available