4.5 Article

Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 93, Issue 11, Pages 1671-1681

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/JPER.22-0059

Keywords

antiinfective agents; gingival recession; periodontal debridement; periodontal pocket; periodontitis; photodynamic therapy; surgical procedure; ultrasonic

Funding

  1. Research Funding Agency from SAo Paulo State (FAPESP), Brazil [2016/15143-0, 2017/05101-0]
  2. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), Brazil [001]
  3. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development from Brazil, CNPq [304269/2019-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared the efficacy of aPDT and OFD in treating residual periodontal pockets in non-furcation sites. OFD was more effective in reducing PPD in deep pockets, but resulted in greater GR. Both treatments decreased levels of P. gingivalis, but only OFD reduced levels of A. actinomycemtemcomitans.
Background The aim of the present study was to compare repeated applications of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) to open flap debridement (OFD) in the treatment of residual periodontal pockets in non-furcation sites. Methods Forty-six subjects with a diagnosis of Stage III or IV Grade C periodontitis, that had been previously treated, participated in the study. Residual pockets were divided between two groups: (1) aPDT group: received ultrasonic periodontal debridement followed by immediate application of aPDT, and repeated on1st, 2nd, 7th, and 14th days; and (2) OFD group: treated by modified papilla preservation technique, where granulation tissue and visible calculus were removed with hand curettes and an ultrasonic device. Clinical, immunological, and microbiological parameters were evaluated before and after treatment. Results Both treatments were effective reducing clinical parameters of disease. OFD resulted in a greater mean probing pocket depths (PPD) reduction in deep pockets (p = 0.001). However, aPDT resulted in a lower occurrence of gingival recession (GR), dentin hypersensitivity (DH) and analgesic intake. Reduction in Porphyromonas gingivalis was observed in both groups. Only the OFD group had a significant reduction in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. aPDT group had greater increase in interleukin 10 (IL-10) levels and a greater reduction of interleukin 1 beta (IL-1 beta) at 14 days when compared to the OFD group (p < 0.05). Conclusion OFD was superior in reducing PPD in deep pockets compared to the aPDT. However, OFD resulted in greater GR. Both treatments lowered P. gingivalis levels but only OFD reduced levels of A. actinomycemtemcomitans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available