4.3 Review

Evaluating the Growth Assessment Protocol for stillbirth prevention: progress and challenges

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages 737-747

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0209

Keywords

antenatal detection of SGA; DESiGN trial; fetal growth restriction; fetal growth velocity; growth assessment protocol; small for gestational age (SGA); stillbirth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many stillbirths are associated with fetal growth restriction, but this can be avoided. The GAP program has been successful in improving antenatal detection of SGA babies and reducing national stillbirth rates. However, expanding the program in low and middle income settings remains a challenge.
Many stillbirths are associated with fetal growth restriction, and are hence potentially avoidable. The Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP) is a multidisciplinary program with an evidence based care pathway, training in risk assessment, fetal growth surveillance with customised charts and rolling audit. Antenatal detection of small for gestational age (SGA) has become an indicator of quality of care. Evaluation is essential to understand the impact of such a prevention program. Randomised trials will not be effective if they cannot ensure proper implementation before assessment. Observational studies have allowed realistic evaluation in practice, with other factors excluded that may have influenced the outcome. An award winning 10 year study of stillbirth data in England has been able to assess the effect of GAP in isolation, and found a strong, causal association with improved antenatal detection of SGA babies, and the sustained decline in national stillbirth rates. The challenge now is to apply this program more widely in low and middle income settings where the main global burden of stillbirth is, and to adapt it to local needs and resources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available