4.3 Article

Does a cervical pessary reduce the rate of preterm birth in women with a short cervix?

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE
Volume 50, Issue 8, Pages 1107-1114

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2021-0688

Keywords

birth weight; cervical length; cervical pessary; preterm birth; tocolysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cervical pessary effectively reduces cervical shortening during pregnancy, but does not reduce the rate of preterm birth.
Objectives To evaluate neonatal outcomes after the use of a cervical pessary in Japanese women with short cervical length (CL) less than 25 mm. Methods This multicenter study involved women with singleton pregnancies between 20 and 29+6 gestational weeks and a CL of less than 25 mm. The primary outcome was preterm birth (PTB) before 34 weeks of gestation. This study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (JRCT: jRCTs042180102). Results Two hundred pregnant women were enrolled; 114 in the pessary group and 86 in the expectant management group as controls. In the pessary group, all 114 neonates were investigated for perinatal outcomes, and 112 pregnant women were investigated for primary, and secondary outcomes. In the control group, 86 pregnant women were investigated for primary and secondary outcomes and 86 neonates were investigated for neonatal outcomes. There were no significant differences in PTB in <= 34, <= 37, and <= 28 weeks of gestation or in preterm rupture of membranes (PROM) <= 34 weeks between the groups. The gestational weeks at birth and birth weight were significantly higher in the pessary group. Regression analysis demonstrated that the CL decreased without a pessary, whereas the shortening rate was suppressed during the intervention. No significant differences were observed in adverse neonatal outcomes, chorioamnionitis, or preterm PROM. Conclusions The cervical pessary effectively reduced CL shortening during pregnancy resulting in an average increased gestational age, however, did not reduced the rates of preterm birth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available