4.7 Article

Tailoring metalloid elements in Fe-C-P-B amorphous/nanocrystalline alloys with high saturated magnetization and heat-treatable bending ductility

Journal

JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS
Volume 584, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.121515

Keywords

Amorphous alloys; Soft magnetic properties; Bendable; High saturated magnetization; Ab-initio calculations

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51971006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By adjusting the concentration of metalloid elements, it was found that the addition of B is beneficial for glass formation with high Fe content, C addition can improve saturated magnetization, and P addition is beneficial for reducing coercivity. Additionally, optimal amorphous alloys maintain good bending ductility even after annealing treatment close to crystallization temperature.
A family of Fe-C-P-B amorphous alloys with high Fe containing, high saturated magnetization and consistent bending ductility even enduring high-temperature annealing at near crystallization temperature (Tx) was fabricated. The effects of the tunable concentration of metalloid elements on the glass forming range, thermal properties, soft magnetic properties and bending ductility were ascertained in the quaternary model system. For the Fe-C-P-B system, B addition is beneficial for glass formation with high Fe content (up to 87 at.% Fe for Fe87C2P2B9), C addition can improve the saturated magnetization (up to 1.67 T for Fe82C14P2B2), and P addition is beneficial for reducing the coercivity (low to 5.6 A/m for Fe85C2P11B2). Meanwhile, the optimal amorphous alloys can maintain good bending ductility even after annealing treatment close to sub -T-x. The results related with the optimal tailoring of metalloid element are significant for materials design with good soft magnetic and mechanical properties in Fe-based amorphous alloys.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available