4.1 Review

Artificial intelligence-enhanced intraoperative neurosurgical workflow: current knowledge and future perspectives

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages 139-150

Publisher

EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05483-7

Keywords

Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Intraoperative period; Oncology; Spine; Neurosurgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review summarizes the applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in neurosurgical surgeries, including preoperative planning and intraoperative assistance. The review found that ML models can improve surgical team performances by reducing human errors and providing patient-tailored surgical plans.
INTRODUCTION: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) augment decision-making processes and productivity by supporting surgeons over a range of clinical activities: from diagnosis and preoperative planning to intraoperative surgical assistance. We reviewed the literature to identify current AI platforms applied to neurosurgical perioperative and intraoperative settings and describe their role in multiple subspecialties. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review of the literature was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched from inception to December 31st, 2020. Original articles were included if they: presented AI platforms implemented in perioperative, intraoperative settings and reported ML models' performance metrics. Due to the heterogeneity in neurosurgical applications, a qualitative synthesis was deemed appropriate. The risk of bias and applicability of predicted outcomes were assessed using the PROBAST tool. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Forty-one articles were included. All studies evaluated a supervised learning algorithm. A total of 10 ML models were described; the most frequent were neural networks (N.=15) and tree-based models (N.=13). Overall, the risk of bias was medium-high, but applicability was considered positive for all studies. Articles were grouped into four categories according to the subspecialty of interest: neurooncology, spine, functional and other. For each category, different prediction tasks were identified. CONCLUSIONS: In this review, we summarize the state-of-art applications of AI for the intraoperative augmentation of neurosurgical workflows across multiple subspecialties. ML models may boost surgical team performances by reducing human errors and providing patient-tailored surgical plans, but further and higher-quality studies need to be conducted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available