4.7 Article

Oxidation behavior of arc melted AlCoCrFeNi multi-component high-entropy alloys

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 674, Issue -, Pages 229-244

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.257

Keywords

High-entropy; Oxidation; Multi-component; Alumina-former

Funding

  1. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  2. Division Of Materials Research [1411280] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multi-component, high-entropy alloys (HEAs) are being investigated as potential alternatives for high temperature structural materials due to their reported high symmetry crystal structures, favorable mechanical properties, high temperature phase stabilities, and resistances to degradation in oxidizing/corrosive environments. However, their high temperature oxidation behaviors are poorly understood. In this work, the as-cast microstructures and 1050 degrees C oxidation behaviors of a series of arc-melted Al-x(-NiCoCrFe)(100-x) HEAs where x = 8, 10, 12, 15, 20, and 30 (at.%) were investigated. The dominant structure of the low Al concentration HEAs was determined to be FCC, while the high Al concentration HEAs were BCC dominant. A structural transition point at similar to 15 at. % Al exists where a large fraction of both FCC and BCC are present. Each HEA exhibited initial transient oxidation followed by various degrees of parabolic oxide growth. All of the HEAs formed a combination of Al2O3 and AIN beneath an external Cr2O3 scale. Increased Al content improved the continuity and internal position of the Al2O3 scale, resulting in enhanced oxidation resistances. These results are discussed relative to chemically similar conventional alloys and existing Ni-Cr-Al oxide formation models. The resulting phase equilibria has been compared to thermodynamic predictions made using the CALPHAD method. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available