4.2 Review

Machine learning methods for functional recovery prediction and prognosis in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review

Journal

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-022-01032-4

Keywords

Automated pattern recognition; Clinical; Efficacy treatment; Machine learning; Prognosis; Regression analysis; Rehabilitation; Rehabilitation outcome; Stroke

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Health
  2. Department of Excellence in Robotics & AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rehabilitation medicine is undergoing a new development phase, with clinical practice expected to change significantly due to rigorous clinical trials and personalized medical therapies. The emerging field of Rehabilomics relies on biomedical data collection and analysis. This study aims to systematically review machine learning algorithms for predicting motor functional recovery in post-stroke patients after treatment.
Background Rehabilitation medicine is facing a new development phase thanks to a recent wave of rigorous clinical trials aimed at improving the scientific evidence of protocols. This phenomenon, combined with new trends in personalised medical therapies, is expected to change clinical practice dramatically. The emerging field of Rehabilomics is only possible if methodologies are based on biomedical data collection and analysis. In this framework, the objective of this work is to develop a systematic review of machine learning algorithms as solutions to predict motor functional recovery of post-stroke patients after treatment. Methods We conducted a comprehensive search of five electronic databases using the Patient, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome (PICO) format. We extracted health conditions, population characteristics, outcome assessed, the method for feature extraction and selection, the algorithm used, and the validation approach. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). A qualitative description of the characteristics of the included studies as well as a narrative data synthesis was performed. Results A total of 19 primary studies were included. The predictors most frequently used belonged to the areas of demographic characteristics and stroke assessment through clinical examination. Regarding the methods, linear and logistic regressions were the most frequently used and cross-validation was the preferred validation approach. Conclusions We identified several methodological limitations: small sample sizes, a limited number of external validation approaches, and high heterogeneity among input and output variables. Although these elements prevented a quantitative comparison across models, we defined the most frequently used models given a specific outcome, providing useful indications for the application of more complex machine learning algorithms in rehabilitation medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available